High values People,Kya shaan hy asy logun ke,motivation,lawguru

Here motivational video on the topic of High values people:

Procedure of Khula or Dissolution of Marriage,Khula,Dissolution of marriage,lawguru

Here is Urdu/Hindi video on this topic:

Difference between Admission and Confession,Admission and Confession,lawguru

       Difference between Admission and Confession

Confession and admission are both terms used in legal proceedings, but they have different meanings and legal implications.

Confession refers to an acknowledgment or admission of guilt by a person accused of a crime. A confession is generally considered to be a statement in which the accused person explicitly admits to committing the crime. In the legal context, a confession is often considered to be a very strong piece of evidence against the accused, as it can be used to prove their guilt.

Admission, on the other hand, refers to any statement made by a person in a civil case that tends to incriminate them in some way but does not necessarily amount to a full confession. An admission may be made voluntarily or involuntarily, and it may be used as evidence against the person who made it in a court of law. Admissions can take many forms, including verbal statements, written statements, or even nonverbal behavior.

In summary, confession is a specific type of admission that involves a full admission of guilt and crime or offense, while admission is a broader term that uses in civil cases to encompass any statement or behavior that tends to incriminate a person in some way. Both confessions and admissions can be used as evidence in a court of law, but a confession may be considered stronger evidence than an admission because it involves a more explicit admission of guilt.

Here is a very informative video on this topic:

• difference between admission and confession
• admission and confession
• confession
• admission

Right of Accused according to criminal law or constitution,Accuse is Innocent,Accused is favorite child of law,lawguru

Right of Accused according to criminal law or constitution

In criminal law and the Constitution of Pakistan, the rights of an accused are protected under several provisions. Here are some of the most significant rights of accused individuals:

Right to a fair trial: The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees the right to a fair trial to all citizens, including accused individuals. This includes the right to a impartial judge, the right to legal counsel, the right to call witnesses, and the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Right to due process: The Constitution of Pakistan also guarantees the right to due process, which means that an accused individual must be given a fair and impartial hearing, with all the necessary evidence and arguments presented in their defense.

Right to remain silent: An accused individual has the right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves. This means that the prosecution cannot use an accused person's silence against them in court.

Right to bail: In most cases, an accused individual has the right to be released on bail while awaiting trial. Bail is meant to ensure that the accused person appears in court when required and does not pose a danger to society.

Right to appeal: If an accused person is found guilty, they have the right to appeal the verdict. An appeal allows a higher court to review the case and make a final determination of guilt or innocence.

It's important to note that the rights of accused individuals are protected not only by the Constitution of Pakistan but also by international human rights treaties that Pakistan is a party to, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

In summary, the rights of accused individuals in criminal law and the Constitution of Pakistan are designed to ensure that they are given a fair and impartial hearing, with all necessary evidence and arguments presented in their defense. These rights are essential for protecting the rights of citizens and maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system.

Here is a very informative video on this topic:

ADPP paper Important Topics and Syllabus,Public Prosecutor Exam,lawguru

Here is a very informative video on this topic:

Father can make guardian of their children,Guardian Act,lawguru

Here is a very informative video on this topic:

Difference between Investigation, Inquiry and Trial and Investigation,lawguru

Difference between Investigation, Inquiry, and Trial and Investigation

In criminal law, "trial," "inquiry," and "investigation" are three distinct stages in the criminal justice process. Here is a brief overview of the difference between these three stages:

Investigation: This is the first stage of the criminal justice process, where law enforcement agencies gather information about a crime that has been committed. The goal of the investigation is to identify the suspects and collect evidence to support the prosecution's case.

Inquiry: Inquiry is the stage where the investigating agencies present the evidence they have gathered to a judicial officer, such as a judge or a magistrate. The judicial officer then decides whether there is sufficient evidence to charge the suspect with a crime and proceed to a trial.

Trial: If the judicial officer finds sufficient evidence to support a charge, the case will proceed to a trial. During the trial, both the prosecution and the defense present their evidence and arguments, and a judge or a jury will decide whether the suspect is guilty or not guilty of the crime.

It is important to note that not all cases go through all three stages. For example, in some cases, the investigation may reveal that there is not enough evidence to support a charge, and the case will not proceed to a trial. In other cases, the suspect may plead guilty to the charges, in which case a trial will not be necessary.

In summary, the investigation stage is about gathering information and evidence, the inquiry stage is about determining whether there is enough evidence to charge the suspect with a crime, and the trial stage is about determining the guilt or innocence of the suspect.

Here is a very informative video on this topic: