Difference between Void and illegal order
In legal terms, a "void" order and an "illegal" order are two distinct concepts with different implications.
A void order is one that is not enforceable because it is missing some essential element that makes it valid. For example, an order made by a judge who lacked jurisdiction over the matter, or an order that violates due process of law, would be considered void. A void order has no legal effect and cannot be enforced by the courts.
An illegal order, on the other hand, is one that is not only unenforceable but also contrary to the law. An illegal order may be issued by a person who has the authority to issue such an order, but the content of the order is against the law. For example, an order that requires someone to perform an illegal act, such as a bribe, would be considered illegal. An illegal order is not only unenforceable but also exposes the person issuing the order to criminal liability.
In short, while both void and illegal orders are unenforceable, a void order is missing some essential element to be valid, while an illegal order is not only unenforceable but also against the law.
HERE IS A VIDEO ON THIS TOPIC:
