Difference between article and section,lawguru

        Difference between article and section

In legal writing, an "article" typically refers to a numbered division within a statute or other legislative document that addresses a particular topic or subject. Articles are often used in multi-article documents, such as a constitution or a commercial code, to organize and categorize different provisions of the law.

On the other hand, a "section" refers to a particular provision or subdivision within an article or other legal document. Sections are typically designated with a number or letter, and they may be used to define specific rules, requirements, or exceptions within the broader context of an article or statute.

In summary, articles are larger divisions within a legal document that group related provisions together, while sections are the individual units within those articles that specify the specific details of the law.

There is video on the topic of difference between article and section:

Difference between civil judge,Magistrate,ASJ,Session Judge,Justice,lawguru

Here is the video about the difference between Civil Judge, Magistrate,Aditional Session Judge, and many more:

Difference between Assistant District Public Prosecutor Deputy District Public Prosecutor and many more, Structure of Prosecution department in Pakistan

Here is video about the prosecution department in Pakistan:

Sharif Badmash,funny video,lawguru

Here is funny video about sharif badmash:

way wakeela very beautiful poem for Lawyers,lawguru

Here is very beautiful Punjabi poem for lawyers:

Discretion power of court,judge and hen,funny story about court judgement

Here is a very funny story video about court discretion power and judgment:

Difference between Void and illegal order,LAWGURU

       Difference between Void and illegal order

In legal terms, a "void" order and an "illegal" order are two distinct concepts with different implications.

A void order is one that is not enforceable because it is missing some essential element that makes it valid. For example, an order made by a judge who lacked jurisdiction over the matter, or an order that violates due process of law, would be considered void. A void order has no legal effect and cannot be enforced by the courts.

An illegal order, on the other hand, is one that is not only unenforceable but also contrary to the law. An illegal order may be issued by a person who has the authority to issue such an order, but the content of the order is against the law. For example, an order that requires someone to perform an illegal act, such as a bribe, would be considered illegal. An illegal order is not only unenforceable but also exposes the person issuing the order to criminal liability.

In short, while both void and illegal orders are unenforceable, a void order is missing some essential element to be valid, while an illegal order is not only unenforceable but also against the law.

HERE IS A VIDEO ON THIS TOPIC: